One question that kept coming up this week was whether investors are more interested in a growth story or a path to profitability. Everyone, especially those from outside the U.S. are baffled by unicorns like Lyft and Uber that state in their respective prospectuses that they may never be profitable. As you can imagine the discussions and opinions on this topic are wide ranging.
By now most of you have read about the latest of three related scandals to hit elite academic institutions this year. The latest involves a fixer masquerading as a college admissions counselor to the rich and famous, Rick Singer. Singer claims to have helped more than 760 children of the privilege change test scores, pretend to be elite athletes, and outright bribe their way into top universities.
On the final day of The Entrepreneur’s BootCamp we have each participant deliver a three minute pitch. No slides, notes, or props of any kind are allowed. Just you and three minutes in which to engage the audience and explain the target audience and the problem, your solution and how it gets the job done, why it is unique, and how you make money. It may seem a bit unfair, but as it turns out three minutes is enough time to convey the value that your idea creates for the target market at the intersection of desirability, feasibility, and viability.
I had a conversation recently with an old friend who has joined a new startup. His company is considering making a pretty big investment in its employees. He had remembered that I started my career at IBM some years ago and often noted how good the training was. At that time, we’re talking mid 80’s, the company invested countless hours and dollars in fairly comprehensive sales, service, and technical education. I spent the first year and half attending monthlong courses in IBM’s Atlanta and Dallas education centers. When I was back in NYC the company paid for me to take classes at the NY Institute of Finance.
This is Part III of a four part series.
Approaching the Market
Preparation as described in Parts I and II of this four part series will help to improve your chances of success when it comes to securing money from investors. Here are a several items to consider as you begin to schedule meetings.
I field a lot of inquiries from founders wanting advice and assistance with their pitch. An awful amount of preparation and perspiration goes in to creating a presentation that most of the time no one ever gets completely through. Strategy development through PowerPoint iteration is a terrible way to attempt to build a business. Your time would be better spent on developing and testing the business model.
I don’t usually delve into politics on this blog, but when the actions of the government begin to affect the economy and in particular small businesses, I’ll break my rule.
I was a bit shocked to learn recently that Congress continues to get paid while government workers remain unpaid due to the shutdown. Some of these workers must continue to work because their jobs are essential to our safety and security.
The following is part of a four part series on tips for getting from Seed to Series A.
Much has been written about the Seed to Series A trough or valley of death. It is no doubt more challenging to raise a Series A than it is to raise a Seed. Institutional investors (venture capitalists) require much more proof that you have a great team with a good idea that is targeted at a potentially enormous market opportunity.
The Sunday New York Times featured an article about how entrepreneurs are resisting turning to venture capitalist for money. As you can imagine the article has generated a lot of buzz and the usual “piling on” that follows a media attack on a group, especially a wealthy group. The article describes how venture capital is bad for some startups and attempts to provide some reasons for this.